Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993790›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026

Simulation-based training and education in laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Yaping Zhang, Jiliang Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaping ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiliang ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgery necessitates mastery of intricate anatomical relationships and precision-dependent techniques. This review synthesizes advancements in simulation-based training and education modalities- three-dimensional (3D) printing, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR). 3D-printed models provide unparalleled tactile fidelity for patient-specific anatomy replication but lack dynamic physiological responses. VR enables risk-free procedural repetition and AI-driven skill optimization, yet struggles with haptic authenticity. AR bridges preoperative planning and intraoperative execution through real-time holographic navigation but faces challenges in cognitive load management. Future advancements must prioritize hybrid simulation ecosystems integrating biomechanical realism with adaptive virtual interfaces, validated transfer-to-practice metrics, and ethical frameworks for emerging technologies.

Indexed as

3D-printedaugmented realitysurgical educationsurgical simulationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41993790
PMCPMC13079336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.