ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Comparative effectiveness of neuroendoscopic surgery and stereotactic aspiration for brain hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) involving the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem is a critical condition with high mortality. While minimally invasive surgical techniques are widely utilized, the comparative effectiveness of neuroendoscopic surgery (NS) vs. stereotactic aspiration (SA) across different anatomical locations remains underexplored. This study aims to retrospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of NS and SA in a cohort encompassing different IPH locations. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on 199 patients with IPH (NS: Results: Overall, NS demonstrated a significantly higher median hematoma reduction rate compared to SA (92.90% vs. 22.20%, Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that NS is associated with higher evacuation efficiency and more pronounced early neurological recovery across various IPH locations compared to SA. While prospective validation is required to confirm long-term functional trajectories, these findings highlight the potential advantages of direct visualization and active hemostasis in managing IPH across different anatomical locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.