ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Predicting maize hybrid performance with machine learning and a locus-specific weighted degree of dominance transformation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic architecture of a trait plays a vital role in the predictive ability of genomic models. While classical methods such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) remain widely used in plant breeding, the value of machine learning (ML) is increasing because of its ability to capture non-linear effects. This study assessed ML and classical models incorporating a locus-specific weighted dominance effect transformation matrix for genomic prediction in hybrid maize. We evaluated five models in simulated and real hybrid maize dataset: (1) XGBoost with transformed SNP marker matrix (ML_Transformed), (2) XGBoost with conventional SNP marker matrix (ML), (3) GBLUP with additive effects only (AM), (4) GBLUP with additive and dominance effects (ADM), and (5) GBLUP with transformed SNP marker matrix (CADM). Two hybrid maize dataset were simulated, polygenic and oligogenic with dominance levels ranging from 0% to 40% while the real maize hybrid dataset evaluation consisted of traits with diverse genetic architectures, including grain yield, test weight, ear height, plant height, pollen and silk days after planting, and grain moisture. Results showed that the dominance transformation had mixed effects: it did not enhance ML performance, but only improved CADM in simulated scenarios. Across both simulated and real data, ML generally exceeded GBLUP performance, except in polygenic simulations where CADM outperformed all other models including the ML models. We also found that increasing dominance levels generally reduced predictive accuracy, regardless of the model. In general, these results suggest that CADM and ML_Transformed are promising for application in plant breeding. However, their success depends on the underlying traits genetic architecture, highlighting the importance of dominance-incorporating and trait-adaptable approaches to genomic prediction for optimizing breeding strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.