Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993719›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Design considerations for miniaturized biosensor-enabled systems for older adults: insights from participatory design.

Mia Quidato, Merlin Teodosia Suarez, Ryan Ebardo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mia QuidatoDe La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Merlin Teodosia SuarezDe La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Ryan EbardoDe La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturized technologies, including small, portable, or wearable devices such as biosensors, smartwatches, and implantable devices, are transforming health and wellness by enabling real-time, personalized monitoring and interventions, offering older adults (OAs) greater engagement with digital health and support for self-management and well-being. OAs, however, often face usability challenges due to changes in vision, mobility, cognition, and digital literacy, highlighting the need for inclusive design. Participatory design (PD) engages OAs directly, ensuring technologies are meaningful, functional, and relevant to their everyday lives. This mini-review identifies how participatory design has been applied to emerging technologies for older adults and derives inclusive design considerations for the co-design of miniaturized, biosensor-enabled systems. A total of 22 studies published between 2020 and 2025 were synthesized and categorized into digital health technologies and civic platforms, human-robot interfaces (HRIs) for socially assistive/facilitative robots, voice-based interfaces, and immersive visualizations. Analysis revealed recurring considerations, including clarity, usability, engagement, and trustworthiness, informing a framework for age-inclusive, human-centered, miniaturized biosensor-enabled technologies.

Indexed as

health and wellnessminiaturizedolder adultsparticipatory designreviewthematic framework

Identifiers

PMID41993719
PMCPMC13079303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.