Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993654›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Navigating the delicate balance of the transorbital approach.

Kyung In Woo, Doo-Sik Kong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyung In WooDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Doo-Sik KongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transorbital approach (TOA) is a significant advance in minimally invasive neurosurgery, eliminating the need for the extensive craniotomy and brain retraction typically associated with traditional methods. By accessing deep-brain and skull base lesions through a small periorbital incision, TOA significantly reduces surgical trauma, accelerates recovery, and offers superior esthetics. The well-equipped instruments and navigation system provide a magnified, meticulous view, proving effective for complex lesions near the orbital-cranial junction. However, the technique is challenged by the "narrow passage" and cannot be applied to all skull base lesions. Lateral orbitotomy, often performed via an upper eyelid crease incision, is a common corridor that requires careful navigation and anatomic knowledge to facilitate surgical dissection and minimize complications. Postoperative complications are usually transient, including periorbital edema, diplopia, and ptosis. Although serious long-term sequelae are rare, careful manipulation of orbital tissue and pupillary monitoring are crucial to prevent permanent nerve injury or visual impairment. TOA is a safe and valuable technique, provided there is careful patient selection and a high level of surgical expertise.

Indexed as

Lateral orbitotomyminimally invasive surgeryskull basetransorbital approach

Identifiers

PMID41993654
PMCPMC13082799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.