Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993650›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Artificial intelligence in oculoplastics: Novel applications and future prospects.

Shiqi Hui, Dongmei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shiqi HuiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of the Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dongmei LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of the Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into ophthalmic subspecialties, encompassing oculoplastics, is rapidly evolving. AI has demonstrated significant promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, streamlining clinical workflows, and personalizing surgical decisionmaking. This review aims to summarize current applications of AI in oculoplastics, identify major challenges limiting its broader adoption, and explore future directions for research and clinical translation. We provide a narrative review of peer-reviewed studies and recent developments in AI-assisted diagnosis, image analysis, surgical planning, and patient monitoring within the domain of oculoplastics. Emerging AI applications include automated detection of eyelid tumors, facial analysis for ptosis and orbital disorders, preoperative planning, and postoperative outcome assessment. However, challenges such as limited data diversity, lack of interpretability, regulatory barriers, and ethical considerations persist. AI holds great promise in augmenting oculoplastic care. Moving forward, multidisciplinary collaboration, clinical validation, and advances in multimodal learning will be key to realizing the full potential of AI in this field.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningmedical imagingoculoplasticstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41993650
PMCPMC13082802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.