Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993648›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

From pixels to precision: Imaging technologies shaping oculofacial plastic surgery practice.

Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen, Merve Kulbay, Albert Y Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen *Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Merve Kulbay *Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Albert Y WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in imaging technologies have transformed surgical practice, enabling more accurate diagnoses, refined perioperative planning, and improved patient outcomes. In oculofacial plastic surgery, these tools provide safer and more precise alternatives to traditional approaches, which often relied on invasive exploration or standard imaging with limited accuracy. This review summarizes the current state of imaging technologies in oculofacial plastic surgery and discusses their benefits, limitations, and challenges. Key developments include: (i) Endoscopic imaging, providing high-resolution, magnified visualization for minimally invasive procedures, particularly in lacrimal and orbital surgery, (ii) Exoscopic imaging, a 4K-three-dimensional (3D) external system enhancing precision and team collaboration in microsurgery, (iii) Magnetic resonance imaging offering detailed 3D images of internal structures, with emerging 7T systems providing higher resolution and improved tissue contrast, (iv) Stereotactic navigation, integrating preoperative imaging with real-time tracking to guide complex orbital procedures and fracture repairs, (v) Artificial intelligence-based imaging tools, including machine learning models for disease detection, surgical planning, and outcome prediction, as well as text-to-image systems for preoperative patient counseling. Together, these technologies reduce operative risk, improve functional and esthetic outcomes, and enable patient-specific approaches. Despite challenges such as cost, accessibility, technical limitations, and learning curves, the integration of advanced imaging is steering oculofacial plastic surgery toward minimally invasive, data-driven, and patient-centered practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceendoscopic imagingexoscopic imagingimaginglacrimal systemmagnetic resonance imaging 7Tophthalmic plastic surgeryorbital surgerystereotactic navigation

Identifiers

PMID41993648
PMCPMC13082803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.