ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
From pixels to precision: Imaging technologies shaping oculofacial plastic surgery practice.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in imaging technologies have transformed surgical practice, enabling more accurate diagnoses, refined perioperative planning, and improved patient outcomes. In oculofacial plastic surgery, these tools provide safer and more precise alternatives to traditional approaches, which often relied on invasive exploration or standard imaging with limited accuracy. This review summarizes the current state of imaging technologies in oculofacial plastic surgery and discusses their benefits, limitations, and challenges. Key developments include: (i) Endoscopic imaging, providing high-resolution, magnified visualization for minimally invasive procedures, particularly in lacrimal and orbital surgery, (ii) Exoscopic imaging, a 4K-three-dimensional (3D) external system enhancing precision and team collaboration in microsurgery, (iii) Magnetic resonance imaging offering detailed 3D images of internal structures, with emerging 7T systems providing higher resolution and improved tissue contrast, (iv) Stereotactic navigation, integrating preoperative imaging with real-time tracking to guide complex orbital procedures and fracture repairs, (v) Artificial intelligence-based imaging tools, including machine learning models for disease detection, surgical planning, and outcome prediction, as well as text-to-image systems for preoperative patient counseling. Together, these technologies reduce operative risk, improve functional and esthetic outcomes, and enable patient-specific approaches. Despite challenges such as cost, accessibility, technical limitations, and learning curves, the integration of advanced imaging is steering oculofacial plastic surgery toward minimally invasive, data-driven, and patient-centered practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.