Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

The formulation of an individualized nursing plan for elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction based on comfort nursing intervention and its influence on patient comfort.

Ruiying Ding, Zhonghong Guo, Rongming Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruiying DingDepartment of Geriatrics, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Zhonghong GuoDepartment of Nursing, Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Rongming DingDepartment of Cardiovascular, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of comfort nursing intervention in the care of elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction to improve patient comfort and quality of life. Method: In this study, 120 elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was given individualized nursing intervention based on comfort nursing intervention, including physical, psychological, social and environmental nursing. The control group received routine nursing measures. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Function Scale, Activities of Daily Living Assessment Scale, Newcastle Nursing Satisfaction Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Scale were used to evaluate the degree of neurological deficits, motor function recovery, self-care ability of daily life, satisfaction with nursing services and anxiety level of the two groups of patients. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. Result: The effective implementation of comfort nursing intervention significantly improved the neurological function, motor ability, activities of daily living and nursing satisfaction of elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction, and reduced the level of anxiety ( Conclusion: The effective implementation of comfort nursing intervention significantly improved the comfort and quality of life of elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction, indicating that the application of this theory in clinical nursing is of great value.

Indexed as

acute cerebral infarctioncomfort nursing interventionindividual nursingnursingstroke

Identifiers

PMID41993638
PMCPMC13079160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.