ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
PsychoPharm aggregated risk score (PARS): a multidimensional tool to flag high-risk pharmacotherapy in psychiatric patients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polypharmacy and Drug-Drug Interactions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Clinical Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Exploratory prescribing risk profiles and drug drug interaction burden in older adults with depressive episodes.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Psychiatric outpatients frequently receive complex, long-term regimens where polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), QT interval risk, anticholinergic load, and serotonergic exposure co-occur. Clinicians must triage drug lists quickly, yet most tools address a single risk domain. We developed the PsychoPharm Aggregated Risk Score (PARS), a visit-level composite score that integrates multiple pharmacological risk domains into a single, clinically interpretable signal. Methods: We analyzed 2,666 visits from 680 adults in ambulatory psychiatry. For each visit, we computed the risk components: DDI score from DrugBank, AZCERT QT risk, anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB), serotonergic exposure, and polypharmacy ( Results: The prevalence of high-risk cases was observed in 25.2% of visits. Across validation schemes, the primary 80-20 patient-level split achieved the best accuracy, precision, and F1 at the 0.30 operating point. In the primary 80-20 split stratified by High-risk status, the logistic model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (patient-bootstrap 95% CI 0.875-0.971). Discrimination was similar with additional age and sex stratification (AUC of 0.938) and 5-fold GroupKFold (pooled out-of-fold AUC 0.939), indicating robustness to partitioning. In the drug-only model, positive associations included drugs such as quetiapine, haloperidol, clozapine, and amiodarone. The highest-ranked visits combined central nervous system-heavy regimens and polypharmacy. Conclusion: As an exploratory tool, PARS integrates DDIs, QT risk, anticholinergic cognitive burden, serotonergic exposure, and polypharmacy into a single probability that reliably discriminates High-risk visits and supports screening at a 0.30 operating threshold. Our approach highlights actionable drug combinations and patient profiles for drug review and deprescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.