ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modulation of feature attention by reward prediction error explains value learning behavior.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive behavior requires learning the value of environmental features while selectively attending to those most likely to yield reward. Reward prediction errors (RPEs) drive value learning and learned values guide attention, yet the computational function linking RPEs to attentional modulation remains unspecified. Here, we developed a reinforcement learning model with a perceptual front-end to investigate how value and RPE signals modulate attentional gain during learning. We compared five candidate RPE-attention transfer functions, each combined with either single- or multi-focus attention, against behavioral data from two adult male rhesus macaques performing a color-value learning task with shifting reward contingencies. Monkeys exhibited rapid initial learning followed by sub-optimal asymptotic accuracy. Overall, single-focus architectures consistently outperformed multi-focus counterparts on matching monkey errors, indicating that macaques collapse the value distribution into a winner-take-all attentional focus. Furthermore, the "Switch" model, in which attention targets the highest-valued feature but transiently inverts following negative RPEs, produced the fastest exploration dynamics following target switches and, together with the Absolute Value model, yielded decision confidence trajectories that positively correlated with empirical reaction times. In support of this, single-neuron correlation analyses revealed that 27 - 42% of neurons in prefrontal cortex, frontal eye fields, and lateral intraparietal area encoded previous-trial RPE at the time of next trial onset. In total, we conclude that capacity constrained attention that inverts its focus after negative RPE best explains value learning dynamics. These results provide a normative account for why biological learners sacrifice asymptotic precision for rapid adaptation in volatile environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.