ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Simulation-guided design of exotendons to reduce the energetic cost of running.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A passive device that attaches to the feet, called an exotendon, can reduce the energetic cost of running at moderate speeds, but its efficacy and optimal design parameters at higher speeds are unknown. Identifying optimal parameters at new speeds experimentally would require many experimental trials with different exotendon designs, which is challenging for participants at higher running speeds. We developed a muscle-driven simulation framework to predict the effect of various exotendon designs on the energetic cost of running at an experimentally untested speed (4 m/s). We used these predictions to select four designs, which we evaluated experimentally as users ran at this speed. The framework correctly predicted that an exotendon that reduced energetic cost at 2.7 m/s would also reduce energetic cost at 4 m/s (10% predicted vs. 5.7% measured) and that a short, stiff exotendon and a long, compliant exotendon would not significantly reduce energetic cost. However, exotendon parameters predicted by the simulation to maximize energetic savings did not significantly reduce energetic cost when evaluated experimentally. There was variability between participants in both the magnitude of maximum energy savings and the exotendon condition associated with those savings. In a 5-km time trial performed with and without the exotendon condition that elicited the largest energy savings for each participant during the experiment, we observed a lower average heart rate (-3.9 ± 3.8 beats/min;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.