ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Statistical Principles Define an Open-Source Differential Analysis Workflow for Mass Spectrometry Imaging Experiments with Complex Designs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) characterizes the spatial heterogeneity of molecular abundances in biological samples. Experiments with complex designs, involving multiple conditions and multiple samples, provide particularly useful insight into differential abundance of analytes. However, analyses of these experiments require attention to details such as signal processing, selection of regions of interest, and statistical methodology. This manuscript contributes a statistical analysis workflow for detecting differentially abundant analytes in MSI experiments with complex designs. Using a case study of histologic samples of human tibial plateaus from knees of osteoarthritis patients and cadaveric controls, as well as simulated datasets, we illustrate the impact of the analysis decisions. We illustrate the importance of signal processing and feature aggregation for preserving biological relevance and alleviating the stringency of multiple testing. We further demonstrate the importance of selecting regions of interest in ways that are compatible with differential analysis. Finally, we contrast several common statistical models for differential analysis, showcase the appropriate use of replication, and demonstrate model-based calculation of sample size for followup investigations. The discussion is accompanied by detailed recommendations and an open-source R-based implementation that can be followed by other investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.