ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Development and validation of two economical and flexible immunoassays for detecting antibodies against LCMV in mouse serum.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement of antibody responses to viral infection is essential for surveillance, diagnostics, epidemiological research, and natural history of infection studies. However, current methods to detect virus-specific antibodies are often resource-intensive and impractical for deployment in outbreak settings or in field-based studies. This manuscript presents two economical, high-throughput immunoassays-the cytoblot immunoassay (CBA) and strip immunoblot assay (SIA)-for detecting and quantifying anti-lymphocytic choriomeningitis mammarenavirus (LCMV) antibodies in mouse serum. To validate, we tested serum from acutely or persistently experimentally infected mice. Both assays detected LCMV-specific IgG and IgM antibodies with high sensitivity and specificity across multiple timepoints. By facilitating the study of immune responses in rodent reservoirs, these tools can enhance our understanding of zoonotic viral transmission, provide scalable platforms for outbreak preparedness, and serve as adaptable models for the development of rapid serological assays for other viral pathogens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.