ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Mitochondrial Transplantation in the Eye: A Review and Evaluation of Surgical Approaches.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to major blinding diseases, including age-related macular degeneration and glaucoma. Although mitochondrial transplantation has shown therapeutic potential in multiple organ systems, translation to the eye remains limited, partly due to uncertainty regarding optimal delivery. We summarize the biologic rationale and preclinical evidence supporting ocular mitochondrial transplantation and present feasibility data evaluating clinically relevant delivery routes. Methods: We conducted a focused narrative review of ocular mitochondrial transplantation. For feasibility experiments, mitochondria with an endogenous fluorescent dye were isolated from liver donor mice. Postnatal day 7 pups received subretinal injections, and adult CD1 mice received intravitreal injections, including optic nerve head directed delivery. Eyes were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Mitochondrial uptake was assessed in cultured retinal pigmental epithelial (RPE) cells using co-incubation assays. Suprachoroidal delivery feasibility was evaluated in cadaveric human near-real surgical specimens using a novel dedicated suprachoroidal injector. Results: The literature on ocular mitochondrial transplantation remains limited and consists primarily of small preclinical studies using intravitreal delivery and imaging-based detection. In our experiments, intravitreal delivery produced donor signals predominantly within inner retinal layers, with enrichment along retinal nerve fiber bundles when directed toward the optic nerve head. Cultured RPE cells demonstrated dose-dependent uptake of exogenous mitochondria. Subretinal delivery localized donors signal to the RPE and adjacent outer retina. Suprachoroidal injections demonstrated procedural feasibility with reliable access to the suprachoroidal space and visible injectate distribution. Conclusions: Ocular mitochondrial transplantation is in an early stage of investigation. Our feasibility data indicate that established posterior-segment delivery routes expose distinct retinal compartments and that route selection strongly influences anatomic distribution. Further studies are needed to verify intracellular uptake, define dosing and durability, and evaluate safety in disease-relevant models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.