Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993418›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Sulcal anatomy of ventral temporal cortex and reading development.

Jewelia K Yao, Jamie L Mitchell, Alina Davison, Jason D Yeatman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jewelia K YaoDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-0091-6153
Jamie L MitchellDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Alina DavisonSymbolic Systems Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305.
Jason D YeatmanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

Development of Face Perception: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal InvestigationsR01EY022318 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL-SPECTOR, KALANIT · 2012 to 2022
$5.2M
Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Neural mechanisms of successful intervention in children with dyslexiaR01HD095861 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YEATMAN, JASON D · 2019 to 2024
$3.1M
Deep Phenotyping of Dyslexia SubtypesR01HD116845 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jason D Yeatman · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022318NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095861NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD116845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive abilities have been linked to variability in cortical folding, a stable neuroanatomical scaffold largely established in utero. In the domain of reading, recent findings in small groups of typical readers suggest that a sulcal interruption (superficial annectant gyrus, gyral gap) in the left posterior occipital temporal sulcus (lhpOTS) predicts better reading skills, posing the lhpOTS as a potential early biomarker of reading difficulties. However, it remains unknown whether this relationship found in typical readers generalizes to the dyslexic population and whether the lhpOTS can serve as a biomarker for dyslexia or predict response to targeted instruction. To fill these gaps, we examine the patterns of the lhpOTS in 209 children, including children with dyslexia, from four independently-collected samples. In typical readers, we find that the relationship between the lhpOTS and reading skills is robust, replicating across binary and continuous quantifications of the sulcal interruption. However, lhpOTS patterns neither distinguish dyslexic children from typical readers nor do they predict response to intervention. Instead, targeted reading intervention drives long-term gains in reading skills that are equivalent irrespective of VOTC anatomy. Together, these findings distinguish neuroanatomical correlates of skilled reading from determinants of reading impairment and learning capacity and emphasize the importance of the educational environment in supporting reading acquisition for children with dyslexia.

Identifiers

PMID41993418
PMCPMC13081899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.