ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Sulcal anatomy of ventral temporal cortex and reading development.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual differences in cognitive abilities have been linked to variability in cortical folding, a stable neuroanatomical scaffold largely established in utero. In the domain of reading, recent findings in small groups of typical readers suggest that a sulcal interruption (superficial annectant gyrus, gyral gap) in the left posterior occipital temporal sulcus (lhpOTS) predicts better reading skills, posing the lhpOTS as a potential early biomarker of reading difficulties. However, it remains unknown whether this relationship found in typical readers generalizes to the dyslexic population and whether the lhpOTS can serve as a biomarker for dyslexia or predict response to targeted instruction. To fill these gaps, we examine the patterns of the lhpOTS in 209 children, including children with dyslexia, from four independently-collected samples. In typical readers, we find that the relationship between the lhpOTS and reading skills is robust, replicating across binary and continuous quantifications of the sulcal interruption. However, lhpOTS patterns neither distinguish dyslexic children from typical readers nor do they predict response to intervention. Instead, targeted reading intervention drives long-term gains in reading skills that are equivalent irrespective of VOTC anatomy. Together, these findings distinguish neuroanatomical correlates of skilled reading from determinants of reading impairment and learning capacity and emphasize the importance of the educational environment in supporting reading acquisition for children with dyslexia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.