ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Iterative delay correction improves breath-hold cerebrovascular reactivity mapping in clinical populations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), the ability of cerebral blood vessels to dilate or constrict in response to a vasoactive stimulus, is an important measure of cerebrovascular health. Accurate CVR estimation requires accounting for the time required for the vasoactive stimulus to reach each brain region and the time it takes for local arterioles to modulate cerebral blood flow. The temporal search range used to calculate this spatially varying offset can substantially impact CVR estimates, and the appropriate search range may vary across populations, acquisition protocols, and even brain regions. Here, we present an iterative approach for automatically determining the appropriate maximum shift, using breath-hold fMRI data acquired in a cohort of stroke survivors. This approach selectively expands the delay search range only for voxels with estimated delays at the boundary (i.e., near the minimum or maximum shift) until the estimated delay is no longer constrained or a predefined value is reached. In the context of stroke, this approach significantly increased the number of voxels with statistically significant CVR among those initially at the boundary. It also resulted in CVR polarity reversals in voxels originally at the early-response boundary and amplified negative CVR values in voxels originally at the late-response boundary, suggesting that using an iterative maximum shift can critically impact CVR interpretation. This approach is broadly applicable beyond stroke, but careful parameter tuning is required, as illustrated by our demonstration of the parameter tuning process for a participant with Moyamoya disease. Together, these findings suggest that iterative delay correction allows for improved CVR assessments in clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.