ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Kinematics-based assessment of reaching and grasping movements in LRN ablated animals identifies a role for the LRN in endpoint stabilization and reach timing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) is thought to contribute to skilled forelimb control but its specific contributions to reaching and grasping remain unclear. In this paper, we examine skilled reaching in intact adult female Long-Evans rats after bilateral LRN ablation through single-pellet reaching tasks. Tasks were analyzed using sensitive quantitative kinematic analyses and qualitative behavioral scoring. Overall, limb transport was largely preserved after ablation, with results appearing in temporally restricted differences. The clearest deficits emerged in pellet-directed endpoint control. LRN-ablated animals showed broad variability in endpoint covariance, endpoint spread, and increased trial-to-trial variability, indicating that the movement became less precise and less consistent. These effects were more consistent than any single spatial difference seen, suggesting that ablation of the LRN impairs movement refinement rather than inducing a simple directional bias, although the paw height during the reach was significantly effected. Reach duration also changed, but this temporal difference emerged later and was less prominent. Our results suggest that the LRN acts as an important contributor to endpoint stabilization and reach timing during skilled forelimb behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.