ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Tumor Recurrence After Microwave Ablation in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Tumor recurrence remains a major clinical challenge following microwave ablation (MWA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC). Accurate and interpretable prediction of post-ablation recurrence risk is essential for individualized surveillance and management strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (IML) model for predicting tumor recurrence after MWA in patients with sHCC. Methods: This retrospective study included 536 consecutive patients with sHCC treated with ultrasound-guided MWA between July 2017 and July 2023. A two-stage feature selection strategy combining Boruta and LASSO regression was applied to identify the most robust predictors. Six ML algorithms were developed and compared, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and logistic regression (LR). Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and confusion matrices. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Tumor recurrence occurred in 29.1% of patients within 1 year after MWA. Seven variables, including maximum tumor diameter, Child-Pugh grade, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, platelet count (PLT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were selected as predictors. Among all models, XGBoost demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.889 in the validation set, with good calibration and favorable net clinical benefit on DCA. SHAP analysis provided transparent global and individualized explanations, identifying AFP and CRP as the most influential predictors and revealing nonlinear risk patterns. Conclusion: An interpretable XGBoost-based model using routinely available clinical variables accurately predicts recurrence after MWA in patients with sHCC. This model may serve as a clinically accessible approach for individualized risk stratification and post-ablation management; however, further external validation in multicenter cohorts is required before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.