Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993154›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2026

Outcomes of older adult physical activity participation that matter to health care professionals.

Peter J Young, Dawn C Mackey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter J YoungDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-1486
Dawn C MackeyDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: There is extensive heterogeneity in outcome domain selection and reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity interventions for older adults. Physical activity researchers need a core outcome set that recommends a minimum set of outcome domains to measure consistently, guided by input from health care professionals to ensure clinical relevance. This study aimed to identify the outcome domains related to older adults' physical activity participation that are most important to health care professionals. Research Design and Methods: Health care professionals completed an online survey in which they rated the importance of measuring 24 candidate outcome domains in future RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults and ranked their top four. Results: 225 health care professionals participated (72% female; mean [SD] age, 37.8 [11.2] years; 21 general practitioners, 99 physiotherapists, and 105 kinesiologists). The 5 outcome domains most frequently rated as "highly important" (6-7 of 7) were Falls (92.0%), Quality of Life (91.5%), Independence (87.9%), Balance (84.4%), and Mobility (82.7%). The 5 outcome domains that most frequently appeared in participants' top 4 importance rankings were Quality of Life (67.1%), Independence (50.2%), Risk and Management of Chronic Disease (40.2%), Mobility (33.3%), and Falls (32.9%). Discussion and Implications: Health care professionals prioritized Quality of Life, Independence, Falls, and Mobility as key outcome domains to measure in RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults. These results will help align research with clinical priorities, support physical activity promotion, and guide the development of a core outcome set.

Indexed as

Clinical trial designCore outcome setExerciseOnline surveyStandardized outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41993154
PMCPMC13082369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.