Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41993140›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Physiological artefact control in real-time fMRI neurofeedback - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jingying Zhang, Franziska Weiss, Peter Kirsch, Martin Fungisai Gerchen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingying ZhangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9616-5373
Franziska WeissDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter KirschDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Martin Fungisai GerchenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological artefacts are a general challenge in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and are of particular relevance in real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rt-fMRI NF), where they can contaminate the training procedure and lead to undesired effects. However, physiological noise correction has not received corresponding attention in rt-fMRI NF and most attempts have mainly focused on offline data correction. Given the relatively rare use of physiological denoising methods in rt-fMRI NF and little knowledge about how these methods relate to reported outcomes, in this paper we review recent practices in physiology correction, and conduct a meta-analysis to summarize how reported outcomes vary across different correction approaches. A total of 227 studies were included. We found that physiology correction methods are still not very common offline (29.1%) and online (31.3%) and that even basic physiology recordings are still quite rarely reported in rt-fMRI studies (18.1%). This suggests that the implementation of physiological noise correction and use of concurrently recorded physiological signals is still in early stages. When summarizing reported outcomes of real-time target signal regulation, we found that studies employing online physiological correction did not systematically report smaller meta-analytic effect sizes than studies without such correction. Among correction methods,

Indexed as

fMRImeta-analysisneurofeedbackphysiological artefactsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41993140
PMCPMC13081740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.