ArticleAnnals of neurology2026
Longitudinal Phenotypic Trajectories in GNAO1-Related Disorders: Defining Disease Progression and Clinical Profiles.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and feasibility of oral zinc for patients withEClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePathogenic variants in GNAO1 cause a spectrum of epilepsy, movement disorders, and developmental impairment. Clinical heterogeneity complicates prognosis and therapeutic development. We present the first longitudinal natural history study of GNAO1-related disorders (GNAO1-RD) to delineate phenotypic trajectories.
methodsSixty-six individuals with GNAO1-RD were included in a cross-sectional analysis. Of these, 21 were enrolled in a prospective natural history arm (March 2021-December 2024), undergoing annual standardized evaluations with validated clinical scales to monitor phenotypic progression.
resultsOur cohort exhibited broad phenotypic and severity variability. GNAO1-RD severity scores ranged from 0.5 to 13. Neurodevelopmental impairment varied: 45.5% lacked head control, whereas 22.7% achieved independent walking; and 65% had no expressive language. Movement disorders were nearly universal (95.5%), with dyskinetic crises in 54.5%. Epilepsy affected 51.5%, with different seizure types. Individuals carrying recurrent variants showed consistent phenotypes and severity, supporting a genotype-phenotype correlation reinforced by molecular functional data. Molecular functional analysis for 20 of 31 missense variants correlated with severity scores. Longitudinal data from 21 patients in the natural history cohort showed overall stability or mild improvement across most functional domains. No significant deterioration was observed in global severity, motor function, cognition, or quality of life. However, severe patients experienced progressive worsening of movement disorder.
interpretationThis largest GNAO1-RD cohort and first longitudinal natural history study provide insights into disease progression. GNAO1-RD generally follows a non-degenerative course, showing stability or mild improvements over time in cognition, language, adaptive skills, and motor function. Importantly, although global severity scores remained stable overall, severe cases showed cumulative functional burden driven by progressive movement disorder, rather than global neurodegeneration. Mortality occurred in a subset of patients because of complications from dyskinetic crises, infections, and epilepsy-related events. Genotype-phenotype data and the GNAO1-RD severity score support early risk stratification and personalized treatment development. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:154-170.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.