Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992926›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Preoperative and postoperative pathology concordance in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study.

Jenny Dimakos, Dong Bach Nguyen, Xing Zeng, Jessica Papillon Smith, Fady W Mansour, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Andrew Zakhari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Preoperative and postoperative pathology concordance in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenny DimakosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9133-9909
Dong Bach NguyenDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-5548
Xing ZengDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2754-7650
Jessica Papillon SmithDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-891X
Fady W MansourDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-4538
Srinivasan KrishnamurthyDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-0902
Andrew ZakhariDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-0393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the concordance between pre- and postoperative pathology in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) undergoing hysterectomy, and identify predictors of malignancy, including sampling method, progestin therapy, and surgical timing.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care academic center in Montreal, Canada, from January 2010 to July 2023. Patients undergoing hysterectomy for EIN were included. Demographics, progestin therapy, sampling method, time from biopsy to surgery, operative details, and final pathology were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with malignant or benign outcomes.

resultsA total of 319 patients were included; 76 received preoperative progestins (medicated group), and 243 did not (unmedicated group). Pathology concordance was 71.2% overall (72.8% unmedicated, 65.8% medicated). Malignancy was found in 11.6% (12.8% unmedicated, 7.9% medicated); benign pathology in 17.2% (14.4% unmedicated, 26.3% medicated). Sampling method was not associated with concordance. In progestin-naïve patients, lower body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-7.13) and premenopausal status (OR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.06-4.58) were associated with benign pathology. In progestin-treated patients, older age (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22) and menopausal hormone therapy use (OR 16.85, 95% CI: 1.85-218.46) predicted malignancy, while longer time to surgery was associated with benign pathology (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.41).

conclusionConcordance between preoperative EIN diagnosis and final hysterectomy pathology was 65.8%-72.8%, depending on progestin therapy. These findings highlight the importance of personalized management strategies in patients with EIN, with attention to patient preference, their risk factors, and treatment response.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituEndometrial NeoplasmsHysterectomyAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodProgestinsRetrospective StudiesProgestinsendometrial cancerendometrial intraepithelial neoplasiaendometrial samplingpathology concordanceprogestin therapy

Identifiers

PMID41992926
PMCPMC13629571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.