ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Preoperative and postoperative pathology concordance in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative and postoperative pathology concordance in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the concordance between pre- and postoperative pathology in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) undergoing hysterectomy, and identify predictors of malignancy, including sampling method, progestin therapy, and surgical timing.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care academic center in Montreal, Canada, from January 2010 to July 2023. Patients undergoing hysterectomy for EIN were included. Demographics, progestin therapy, sampling method, time from biopsy to surgery, operative details, and final pathology were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with malignant or benign outcomes.
resultsA total of 319 patients were included; 76 received preoperative progestins (medicated group), and 243 did not (unmedicated group). Pathology concordance was 71.2% overall (72.8% unmedicated, 65.8% medicated). Malignancy was found in 11.6% (12.8% unmedicated, 7.9% medicated); benign pathology in 17.2% (14.4% unmedicated, 26.3% medicated). Sampling method was not associated with concordance. In progestin-naïve patients, lower body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-7.13) and premenopausal status (OR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.06-4.58) were associated with benign pathology. In progestin-treated patients, older age (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22) and menopausal hormone therapy use (OR 16.85, 95% CI: 1.85-218.46) predicted malignancy, while longer time to surgery was associated with benign pathology (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.41).
conclusionConcordance between preoperative EIN diagnosis and final hysterectomy pathology was 65.8%-72.8%, depending on progestin therapy. These findings highlight the importance of personalized management strategies in patients with EIN, with attention to patient preference, their risk factors, and treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.