ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2026
Neuraminidase-inhibiting antibodies boosted by H1N1pdm infection cross-react differently with H5N1 of clades 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies against neuraminidase (NA) are an independent correlate of protection and the antigenic relatedness between H1N1pdm and H5N1 NAs suggests that seasonal influenza infection may provide cross-reactive immunity. In this study, recent H1N1pdm infection elicited modest NA-inhibiting (NAI) antibody responses against contemporary A/Victoria/4897/2022 (H1N1pdm) but strong responses against older A/California/7/2009 (H1N1pdm). Convalescent sera exhibited significantly higher cross-reactive NAI against clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 (A/Texas/37/2024) than non-flu A patients, whereas H3N2 infection did not elicit such cross-reactivity. NAI titres were comparable between N1-California and N1-Texas but lower against N1-Victoria, indicating greater antigenic similarity between N1-California and N1-Texas. This was supported by stronger inhibition of N1-Texas by N1-California sheep antiserum compared with N1-Victoria sheep antiserum. Surprisingly, H1N1pdm-infected patients exhibited very low NAI against clade 2.3.2.1a H5N1 (N1-Bangladesh; GMT of 171 vs GMT 1159 for N1-Texas). Mouse antisera demonstrated reduced reciprocal inhibition between N1-Texas and N1-Bangladesh, consistent with their antigenic divergence. When four residues in N1-Bangladesh were substituted with their corresponding residues in N1-Texas, N1-Bangladesh antiserum showed reduced NAI, while N1-Texas antisera showed increased inhibition compared with wild-type N1-Bangladesh. This suggests that these amino acid differences are partially responsible for their antigenic divergence. Importantly, longitudinal analysis revealed that boosted cross-reactive NAI responses waned by day 90 post-infection, highlighting their limited durability. Together, these findings demonstrate that seasonal H1N1pdm infection can transiently boost cross-reactive NAI antibodies against clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1, but antigenic divergence in clade 2.3.2.1a limits cross-reactivity. As such, the impact of pre-existing antibody during an H5N1 outbreak is dependent on the infecting clade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.