ArticleItalian journal of food safety2026
Effects of two thawing methods on the shelf life of cephalopod mollusks.
Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thawing is a critical step in cephalopod processing, as it affects physicochemical parameters, microbial stability, and overall product quality. Current European and national guidelines recommend consuming or processing thawed cephalopods within 24 hours, a restriction that often results in substantial food waste. This study evaluated the impact of two thawing methods - rapid water-immersion thawing and slow refrigerated thawing - on the quality of Octopus vulgaris and Illex argentinus over 48 hours of refrigerated storage. A total of 12 animals (6 per species) were thawed using either method (3 rapidly thawed and 3 slowly thawed per species), and sensory quality (organoleptic examination and electronic nose), pH, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, total volatile basic nitrogen, trimethylamine, color, and microbiological indices (mesophilic counts, coagulase-positive staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and coliforms) were analyzed at T0 (day of thawing), T1 (24 hours post-thawing), and T2 (48 hours post-thawing). The results indicate that rapid thawing more effectively preserved the chemical and sensory characteristics of I. argentinus compared to O. vulgaris up to 48 hours post-thawing, whereas slow thawing better preserved the microbiological quality of both species over the same period. Rapid thawing also maintained microbiological parameters within acceptable limits, suggesting that the trends observed beyond the currently recommended 24 hours after thawing may offer useful information for future studies aimed at better defining post-thaw shelf life evolution in cephalopods thawed with different methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.