Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992833›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026

Effect of social interaction negative affect on within-person mentalizing network connectivity.

Alicia Vallorani, Marisa N Lytle, Morgan Gilmer, Melissa Bomberger, Michael N Hallquist, Koraly Pérez-Edgar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia ValloraniDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-5690
Marisa N LytleDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.
Morgan GilmerDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412, United States.
Melissa BombergerDepartment of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Michael N HallquistDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States.
Koraly Pérez-EdgarDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.

Funding

Social Attention and Mentalizing During Puberty and Risk for Social AnxietyF32MH131269 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI VALLORANI, ALICIA · 2023 to 2024
$143k
Examining naturalistic social engagement: Using mobile eye-tracking to investigate individual differences and within-person variation in adolescent behavior, attention, and neural processingF31MH121035 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI VALLORANI, ALICIA · 2020 to 2022
$124k
Child Study CenterCollege of Liberal Arts at The Pennsylvania State UniversityNIMH NIH HHS F31 MH121035NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH131269the Social, Life, and Engineering Sciences Imaging Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding others' intentions and emotions is supported by the mentalizing network, helping people navigate the inherently complex dynamics of social interactions. However, work investigating the mentalizing network often relies on non-naturalistic methods, limiting our understanding of individual differences most apparent within social interaction contexts. We took a naturalistic, multilevel approach to investigate relations between real-world affective expressions, social anxiety symptoms and mentalizing network connectivity. Same gender-identity friend pairs (40 participants; 62.5% Women; 87.5% White) engaged in a social interaction while videos from their individual visual perspectives were recorded. Participants were later scanned while they watched clips of the interaction from their own (self run) and their friend's (friend run) perspective. We found that expressed negative affect, not expressed positive affect, related to within-person variation in mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives. Further, participants higher in social anxiety symptoms showed more consistent mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives when expressed negative affect was higher than average, and particularly when friend negative affect expressions, rather than their own negative affect expressions, were higher. Mentalizing network connectivity may be responsive to shifts in negative affect during social interactions and individuals with higher social anxiety may find negative affect from a friend particularly salient.

Indexed as

AffectBrainInterpersonal RelationsMentalizationSocial InteractionTheory of MindAdolescentAdultAnxietyBrain MappingFemaleFriendsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultmentalizingnaturalistic neurosciencenegative affectsocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID41992833
PMCPMC13166882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.