ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Understanding the Psychological Impacts of Shielding From COVID-19 for Immunocompromised Individuals.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the impact of shielding amongst immunocompromised individuals following the COVID-19 pandemic.
designThis study used a cross-sectional exploratory qualitative design.
methodsA national survey was launched in July 2023 aiming to collect information on the lived experience of individuals who were still shielding. The final question to this study was 'what has been the worst aspect of shielding for you?'. In total, 457 individuals (57%) responded to this question. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsThree themes were identified, associated with the impact of shielding: (1) Navigating risk: including fear of infection, distrust in institutional guidance and measures. (2) Loss and longing: including profound isolation, grieving lost time, loss of freedom and relationships. (3) Betrayed and forsaken: a sense of intentional abandonment by government and lack of understanding from loved ones, causing distress and mistrust.
conclusionThe findings from this study indicate that individuals who are shielding continue to experience profound difficulties that require attention. Measures must be introduced to mitigate the impact of COVID in the immunocompromised, including improving public health messaging and strategies to tackle isolation. Given the high likelihood of future pandemics, it is imperative that strategies are developed to address the needs of its most vulnerable populations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public contribution has formed an integral part in the assignment of this study. The rationale and design of this study was created in partnership with Forgotten Lives UK and the National Clinical Expert Group, who represent 125 clinicians, across 4 nations and 17 medical specialities treating immunocompromised patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.