ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Reconsidering the role of introduced species in the climate-affected and highly invaded eastern Mediterranean.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconsidering the role of introduced species in the climate-affected and highly invaded eastern Mediterranean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioinvasions are considered mostly as a biodiversity and conservation hazard, but in specific situations, introduced species can bring ecological or socioeconomic benefits. We assessed the social-ecological role of marine introduced species in the eastern Mediterranean Sea-a global hotspot of bioinvasions and extirpations-and their potential relevance for achieving conservation and sustainability targets set by the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The adverse effects of introduced species include predation and competition with native species, alteration of food webs, habitat degradation, disruption of fisheries and coastal infrastructure, and risks to human health. Their beneficial effects on biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services include the creation of novel habitats, trophic support for native species, partial functional compensation for declining native taxa, and substantial contributions to fisheries production and food provision. These effects can co-occur and generate trade-offs. Conservation practice should move beyond rigid origin-based assumptions and explicitly account for the context-dependent impacts of introduced species, particularly in regions where native biodiversity and associated functions are rapidly declining due to ocean warming. Introduced species considerations need to be integrated in conservation planning to meet the goal of protecting 30% of the land, sea, and inland waters (GBF Targets 1 and 3) and to sustain ecosystem services, such as food provision, through fisheries (GBF Targets 10 and 11) amid rapid climate change. Incorporating the positive and negative aspects of introduced species into systematic conservation planning can optimize conservation investments through transparent trade-off analyses. By adopting a pragmatic, holistic approach to conservation that recognizes the varied and dynamic roles of introduced species, decision makers can more effectively achieve the GBF conservation and sustainability targets in the eastern Mediterranean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.