ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Improvements in vertical jump by healthy adults at high altitude despite inter-individual differences in neuromuscular coordination changes.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An exploratory, in-field, multimodal assessment of cervical function in adults following to high-altitude trekking with light backpack.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research indicates that the performance is enhanced in situations involving rapid movements at high altitude. However, maintaining equilibrium and walking economically in low-oxygen conditions are often impaired. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of trekking at high altitudes on static balance, vertical jump, gait, and maximal strength symmetry by using portable technologies. Fifteen healthy travelers (eight men and seven women, aged 41.67 ± 14.71 years) completed a high-altitude trekking expedition up to 5000 m and were tested for one-leg standing balance, gait, repeated counter-movement jumps, and symmetry of maximum plantar flexion strength of the ankle at peak altitude (HA) and at low altitude (before and after the high-altitude trek, LApre and LApost). The strategy developed for balance maintenance was focused on sagittal tilt. Gait analysis revealed an increase in hip range of motion in the sagittal and transverse planes at HA. Jump height increased from LApre to HA and LApost, while maximal strength symmetry exhibited non-homogeneous inter-individual changes. The observed increments in vertical jump were attributed to the beneficial effect of trekking, rather than to reduced air density. The use of portable instruments represents a significant advancement for research into motor control and physical performance at high altitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.