ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Mumps disease and vaccination in Africa: A scoping review.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mumps, though often self-limiting, can cause serious complications such as meningitis, orchitis, infertility, deafness, and seizures. Despite rising cases in Africa, most countries do not vaccinate against mumps. This review compiled available evidence on mumps in Africa, focusing on morbidity, mortality, vaccine safety, transmission, and molecular characterization. A systematic search across major databases identified 22 relevant studies published between 1994 and 2024. Nearly half of the studies (45%; n = 10/22) were published in the most recent period (2018-2024), indicating increased research interest in recent years. Of the 22 included articles, 37% examined seroprevalence and incidence, 21% transmission and seroprevalence factors, 17% vaccine safety, 17% vaccination in HIV-positive individuals, and 8% molecular data. Reported seroprevalence ranged from 5 to 88.8% in children and exceeded 90% in adults. The MMR vaccine is generally safe but should be used cautiously in those immunocompromised or have allergic reactions to gelatin. Evidence of antibody loss after HAART in HIV-positive children supports re-vaccination. High seroprevalence without immunization suggests widespread natural infection. It is possible that mumps complications are underreported and under-investigated because of the presumed self-limiting nature of mumps infection. This underscores the need to include mumps vaccination in African immunization programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.