ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026
Large-scale phenotyping of physical and antioxidant traits in peach and apricot cultivars.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of the Nutrient Composition and Polyphenol Content of Organic and Sulphured Dried Apricots From Central Asia.International journal of food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeach and apricot are valued for their sensory attributes and nutritional value; however large-scale evaluations of fruit quality and antioxidant-related traits remain limited. This study aimed to quantify phenotypic diversity and examine relationships between fruit quality and antioxidant traits in 100 peach and 32 apricot cultivars grown under the same experimental conditions.
resultsSubstantial phenotypic diversity was observed for fruit quality and antioxidant traits. Total phenolic contents showed the greatest variation, differing by up to approximately sevenfold among peach and apricot cultivars, while high-antioxidant genotypes were relatively rare. Commercially important cultivars with high antioxidant contents were identified, highlighting potential value for health-oriented markets; of the most widely used cultivars it was 'Andross' and 'Big Top' that may be considered for having high nutritional importance to consumers. Ripening date was only correlated with antioxidant content in nectarine and apricot, indicating that it should not be regarded as a universal predictor of antioxidant accumulation. Juiciness, an important quality trait, varied nearly twofold in both species. Associations among peel and flesh color traits differed among fruit types. Multivariate analyses distinguished cultivar groups, with French-origin apricot cultivars associated with higher antioxidant content, later ripening, and higher ripening index, whereas Greek-origin cultivars clustered separately with generally lower antioxidant levels and reduced peel coloration.
conclusionThe observed diversity provides valuable opportunities for selecting cultivars with desirable sensory attributes and high nutritional value, thereby supporting the development of targeted fruit ideotypes and providing guidance for nutritionally aware consumers. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.