Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992494›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces.

Michael S Shuler, Colton C Mowers, Meera M Dhodapkar, Mitchell Greenberg, David Ngendahimana, Brett A Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comment on: 'Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces'.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael S ShulerAthens Orthopedic Clinic, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Colton C MowersRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Meera M DhodapkarMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mitchell GreenbergThe Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
David NgendahimanaDepartment of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brett A FreedmanMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy relies on suction, commonly set to -125 mmHg, to evacuate wound fluid, but dysvascular and pressure injuries often respond unpredictably. Newton's third law indicates that negative pressure applies an equal and opposite contact pressure on the wound surface, and this study quantified this contact pressure across dressing types, wound configurations and suction levels. Using a porcine explant model, central and peripheral contact pressure measurements were obtained beneath black reticulated open cell foam, white foam and a novel thermoplastic elastomer dressing across plexiglass, intact skin, shallow and deep wounds under -50, -75 and -125 mmHg. Contact pressure increased proportionally with negative pressure, and multivariable modelling demonstrated that dressing type, wound type and suction level significantly influenced pressure, with negative pressure explaining most of the variance (0.77 and 0.68). Thermoplastic elastomer at -50 mmHg in deep wounds produced the lowest contact pressure, whereas black reticulated open cell foam and white foam at -125 mmHg generated elevated contact pressures of approximately +125 to +195 mmHg. These findings show that black reticulated open cell foam at conventional -125 mmHg can create hypoperfusion conditions, whereas thermoplastic elastomer consistently produces the lowest pressures and may enhance perfusion at lower suction levels, offering a physiologic explanation for improved clinical outcomes in dysvascular and pressure injuries treated with reduced negative pressure.

Indexed as

BandagesElastomersNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalPressureSuctionSwineElastomerscontact pressuredeep woundfoam dressingnegative pressure wound therapyporcine explantpressure mappingpressure transductionthermoplastic elastomerwound fillerwound perfusion

Identifiers

PMID41992494
PMCPMC13087202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.