ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: 'Contact Pressure Under Traditional Foam and Novel Thermoplastic Elastomer Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Interfaces'.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy relies on suction, commonly set to -125 mmHg, to evacuate wound fluid, but dysvascular and pressure injuries often respond unpredictably. Newton's third law indicates that negative pressure applies an equal and opposite contact pressure on the wound surface, and this study quantified this contact pressure across dressing types, wound configurations and suction levels. Using a porcine explant model, central and peripheral contact pressure measurements were obtained beneath black reticulated open cell foam, white foam and a novel thermoplastic elastomer dressing across plexiglass, intact skin, shallow and deep wounds under -50, -75 and -125 mmHg. Contact pressure increased proportionally with negative pressure, and multivariable modelling demonstrated that dressing type, wound type and suction level significantly influenced pressure, with negative pressure explaining most of the variance (0.77 and 0.68). Thermoplastic elastomer at -50 mmHg in deep wounds produced the lowest contact pressure, whereas black reticulated open cell foam and white foam at -125 mmHg generated elevated contact pressures of approximately +125 to +195 mmHg. These findings show that black reticulated open cell foam at conventional -125 mmHg can create hypoperfusion conditions, whereas thermoplastic elastomer consistently produces the lowest pressures and may enhance perfusion at lower suction levels, offering a physiologic explanation for improved clinical outcomes in dysvascular and pressure injuries treated with reduced negative pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.