ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Availability of Cancer Screening Across HIV Treatment Sites in the IeDEA Consortium.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Documenting HIV service delivery and adoption of evidence-based practices in HIV care programs: A protocol for a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Application of the Cascade of Care Framework to Guide Evidence-Informed Implementation of Anal Cancer Screening Guidelines.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with HIV, and the importance of cancer screening increases as this population ages. In 2017, 2020, and 2023, cross-sectional surveys were conducted at HIV care sites across 5 continents within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. We described cancer screening availability in 2023 and over time for cervical and anal cancer screening using generalized estimating equations with a logit link function to account for site clustering, rurality, and country income. Of the 220 sites in the 2023 survey, 61% (134/220) reported cervical cancer screening by cytology or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on-site, and 88% (194/220) reported cervical cancer screening by any method, including visual inspection. At sites serving predominantly rural populations, 62% (29/47) exclusively performed screening by visual inspection. Overall, 23% (50/220) of sites performed cytology-based anal cancer screening on-site, and 16% (35/220) had availability of high-resolution anoscopy, either on-site or by referral. Screening for cancer of the liver, colon, lung, prostate, or breast (by imaging) were each available at less than 43% of sites. The odds of cervical cancer screening availability increased by 16% annually from 2017 through 2023 (aOR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27, p = 0.001), while the relative odds of anal cancer screening availability decreased by 9% annually (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99, p = 0.023). Lack of trained staff was the most frequently reported barrier, followed by lack of equipment. Understanding current practices and capacity is essential for the continued integration of cancer prevention in HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.