ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Transgenerational somatic mutations and epigenetic imprints on selected DNA repair gene promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana due to pesticides.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides are known to induce genome instability. Reports on eukaryotes, including humans, mostly covers chromosomal aberrations and DNA strand breaks. Studies on scoring of the rates of loci-specific somatic mutations such as point mutations (PM), somatic homologous recombination (SHR), frameshift mutation (FSM), and transpositions due to pesticides are mostly confined to prokaryotes, using Ames test. Analogous eukaryotic model systems though are available for Drosophila, mouse and certain cell lines, reports using these are meagre, possibly due to the lethality of commercially-used pesticide doses and/or difficulty in assessing large population. DNA replication/repair being conserved among higher eukaryotes, the GUS reporter-based Arabidopsis thaliana system was used to score loci-specific mutations such as PM, SHR, FSM and transpositions. DNA repair gene expression and DNA methylation were studied using real-time PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme digestion PCR, respectively. Four commercially used pesticides not only increased the rates of PM, SHR and FSM, and caused epimutations on selected DNA repair gene promoters, but also induced heritable transgenerational memory. While SHR rates were significantly high in the untreated progeny, FSM rates were high even in the grand progeny. Expression of 15 DNA repair genes increased under at least one of the pesticidal treatments. Eight of 21 DNA repair gene promoters showed altered methylation. MRE11A promoter showed demethylation in the untreated progeny due to all four pesticides. Malathion-induced demethylation was retained in the grand progeny also. Thus this work gauges the severity of various pesticides on inducing heritable loci-specific mutations/epimutations in a non-target system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.