ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Insights from a six-year hair drug analysis compendium in drug-facilitated crimes involving vulnerable population cases.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hair analysis is a well-established matrix in forensic toxicology, offering a valuable alternative or complement to traditional matrices in diverse contexts, including drug-facilitated crimes (DFC), elder abuse, and accidental exposure in children. However, objective interpretation of hair drug concentrations remains challenging due to significant inter-study variability, even for identical compounds. This study included hair analysis results upon the prosecutor's request over six years in the Grenoble Forensic Laboratory in France. Hair analysis was performed using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on Sciex® 5500QT and Waters® TQ-XS mass spectrometers, following the French Society of Analytical Toxicology (SFTA) guidelines. Hair proficiency quality testing ensured reproductive results. This compendium describes 38 cases with hair analysis, including child's exposure and chemical abuse involving both children and the elderly. The study population predominantly involved female victims (84.2%), aged 5 months to 90 years. At least one substance was detected in hair in 26 cases. In twelve cases, hair analyses supplemented blood or urine testing. Substances identified were cocaine, THC, and levamisole in child exposure cases; alprazolam, diazepam, loprazolam, and tiapride in chemical abuse; and mainly MDMA, cocaine, paroxetine, and THC in other cases. This compendium contributes valuable data to the literature, enhancing the interpretation of hair drug concentrations across a broad spectrum of cases characterized by diverse age ranges, hair characteristics, timeframes, and circumstances. This work provides critical comparative data for interpreting findings in forensic cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.