ArticleAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2026
Do ethnoracial differences exist among antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients with no other systemic autoimmune diseases: results from the APS ACTION registry.
Article in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antiphospholipid syndrome: epidemiology and outcomes in the evolving criteria era.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe APS ACTION Registry was created to study long-term outcomes in persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients. The objectives of this study were to examine the ethnoracial differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics of aPL-positive patients with no other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).
methodsA web-based data capture system stores patient demographics and aPL-related medical history. Inclusion criteria are positive aPL results, based on the revised Sapporo APS classification criteria, tested at least twice within one year prior to enrollment. For this cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data, demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of registry patients were analyzed based on self-reported ethnorace (White, Latin American Mestizo [LAM], Asian, and Black).
results728 patients with no history of other SARD (78% with APS classification) were included in the analysis. The ethnoracial distribution was 516 (78%) White, 82 (12%) LAM, 49 (7%) Asian, and 13 (2%) Black. Based on ethnoracial comparisons: (a) there were less females among White patients; (b) livedo reticularis/racemosa was more frequent in LAM patients; and (c) triple aPL positivity was more frequent in Whites, while isolated lupus anticoagulant positivity was more common in LAM patients.
conclusionIn our international registry of persistently aPL-positive patients with or without APS classification, Blacks were the least frequently (2%) reported ethnoracial group. No major ethnoracial differences were found in the aPL-related clinical manifestations. Our analysis highlights the need for further investigation into the genetic and social determinants impacting the clinical and serologic phenotypes of aPL-positive patients across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.