Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992364›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2026

Effects of environmental setting and diet on the gut microbial ecology of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis).

Chloe Cummins, William Sutton, Taina McLeod, Jason W Dallas, Mitra Ghotbi, Lluvia Vargas-Gastélum, N Reed Alexander, Alexander J Rurik, Dale McGinnity, Sherri Doro Reinsch and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chloe CumminsDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
William SuttonWildlife Ecology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A. Merritt Boulevard, Nashville, TN, 37209, USA.
Taina McLeodWildlife Ecology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A. Merritt Boulevard, Nashville, TN, 37209, USA.
Jason W DallasDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
Mitra GhotbiDepartment of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Christian-Albrechts- Universität zu Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 2, 24118, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
Lluvia Vargas-GastélumDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2701 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
N Reed AlexanderDivision of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
Alexander J RurikDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
Dale McGinnityEctotherm Department, Nashville Zoo at Grassmere, 3777 Nolensville Pike, Nashville, TN, 37211, USA.
Sherri Doro ReinschDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 5950 ASREC Lane, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Pia SandonatoEctotherm Department, Nashville Zoo at Grassmere, 3777 Nolensville Pike, Nashville, TN, 37211, USA.
Jessica ArbourDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
Michael FreakeDepartment of Natural Sciences, Lee University, 1120 N. Ocoee St., Cleveland, TN, 37311, USA.
Anthony AshleyChattanooga Zoo, 301 North Holtzclaw Avenue, Chattanooga, TN, 37404, USA.
William TernesChattanooga Zoo, 301 North Holtzclaw Avenue, Chattanooga, TN, 37404, USA.
Elizabeth CulpDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2820 Faucette Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Joseph SpataforaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2701 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Kerry McPhailDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Jason E StajichDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California Riverside, Boyce Hall 1463, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Rebecca HardmanFish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 100 8th Ave SE, St Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
Donald M WalkerDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA. donald.walker@mtsu.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation EF-2125065National Science Foundation EF-2125066National Science Foundation EF-2125067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) have undergone substantial population declines throughout their range, leading them to become the focus of increased conservation efforts, including care in zoo and university settings. However, effective implementation of such conservation strategies often relies on a comprehensive understanding of host health, which can be directly influenced by the gut microbiome, yet characterization of gut microbiota often remains overlooked in ex situ conservation facilities. Additionally, effects on the gut microbiome associated with releasing zoo-reared animals into the wild are poorly understood. Therefore, these circumstances make hellbenders an ideal species to examine the relationship between zoo management strategies and gut microbial dynamics.

methods16S rRNA sequencing was used to investigate dissimilarities between the gut microbiome of hellbenders in zoo and wild settings and to evaluate the impact of implementing a wild diet in zoo-reared hellbenders. Additionally, the bacterial composition of zoo-released individuals and wild resident hellbenders was compared to examine the response of the gut microbiome upon release into natural habitat. Selected samples were also chosen for ITS1 rDNA sequencing as a preliminary investigation of the hellbender gut mycobiome.

resultsHuman rearing strongly affected the gut microbiome, leading to reduced bacterial richness as well as differing community structure than wild hellbenders. However, implementation of a wild diet in a zoo setting modulated the microbiome and appeared to be mainly driven by bacterial turnover. Additionally, both bacterial and fungal gut assemblages demonstrated the capacity for restructuring upon release into native habitat to become more reflective of a wild-type microbiome.

conclusionsWe completed the first study elucidating the gut microbial composition patterns of hellbenders, across both zoo and wild settings. These results provide an understanding of the potential impacts of conservation populations in zoos on gut microbial communities and also inform headstart programs of the transition of the gut microbiome post-reintroduction to the wild.

Indexed as

Eastern hellbenderGut microbiomeHeadstart programRewildingWild dietZoo

Identifiers

PMID41992364
PMCPMC13088468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.