Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992361›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Effectiveness of shoulder symptom modification approaches in managing patients with frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial.

Ayesha Seemab, Watson Arulsingh, Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Praveen Kumar Kandakurti, Roohin Saiyad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06763601 (Effect of Shoulder Symptom Modification Procedure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06763601 narecruitingnot on this map

Effect of Shoulder Symptom Modification Procedure (SSMP) in Managing Patients with Frozen Shoulder: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGulf Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsFrozen ShoulderArmsSSMP, Isometric exercise, eccentric exercise, heavy slow resistance , functional program, MWM,Isometric exercise, eccentric exercise, heavy slow resistance , functional program, sham mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayesha SeemabPhysiotherapy Division, College of Health Sciences, Gulf MedicalUniversity, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Watson ArulsinghPhysiotherapy Division, College of Health Sciences, Gulf MedicalUniversity, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. dr.watson@gmu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-0818
Ramprasad MuthukrishnanPhysiotherapy Division, College of Health Sciences, Gulf MedicalUniversity, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Praveen Kumar KandakurtiPhysiotherapy Division, College of Health Sciences, Gulf MedicalUniversity, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Roohin SaiyadThumbay Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom modification approaches in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice reduce pain and enhance movement. In our study two symptom modification approaches, shoulder symptom modification procedure (SSMP) and mobilization with movement (MWM) along with sham mobilization are compared. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the above approaches in managing pain and shoulder disability and improving shoulder movement in patients with frozen shoulder.

methodsA total of 36 patients with frozen shoulder, will be randomly allocated for 8 weeks into three groups: (a) the SSMP group (n = 12) (b) the mobilization with movement (MWM) group(n = 12) and (c) sham mobilization group (n = 12). Patients with frozen shoulder aged 40-65 and meeting the inclusion criteria will be eligible. Each group will receive 3 sessions in a week for 8 weeks along with different exercises including isometric, eccentric and concentric followed by the functional program. Measurements will occur at four time points: before the initiation of treatment sessions (week 0), followed by 12 treatment sessions (week 4), then 18 treatment sessions (week 6) and two months from the beginning of the trial (week 8). The primary outcome was functional disability (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity (NPRS), active shoulder range of motion (ROM), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). DISCUSSION: This pilot study is the first to examine the effectiveness of symptom-modification approaches in patients with frozen shoulder. The study aims to provide preliminary data on feasibility, safety, and early clinical outcomes, as well as to document challenges encountered during implementation. Findings from this investigation will inform the design, methodology, and sample size estimation for a future large-scale randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of symptom-modification interventions in this population.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT06763601. Registered on 12/11/2024. URL of trial registry record: https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/prs/beta/studies/S000F7NU00000067/recordSummary .

Indexed as

BursitisExercise TherapyMusculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesShoulder JointShoulder PainAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdhesive capsulitisFrozen shoulderManual therapyMobilization with movementNPRSRange of motionSham mobilizationSPADISymptom modification

Identifiers

PMID41992361
PMCPMC13202908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.