ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026
Risk factors for physical restraint use with children and youth in community and inpatient mental health settings in Ontario.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe application of physical restraints in child and youth mental health settings remains controversial. Physical restraints are control interventions involving the use of a physical device or manual holding to restrict a young person’s movement. Although their use is permitted to manage risky behaviours, physical restraints can cause severe physical and psychological harm in children and youth. Existing literature on restraint use focuses on children and youth in inpatient settings, while research on its use in community health settings remains limited.
methodsThe current study aims to examine patterns and risk factors associated with the use of physical restraints among children and youth in both inpatient and community health settings. Data for this study were drawn from the interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health (ChYMH) assessment instruments (including those with developmental disabilities; ChYMH-DD), implemented by trained professionals as part of standard clinical practice. The sample comprised of 32,422 children and youth aged 4–18 receiving mental health services in Ontario between 2012 and 2022, across community and inpatient settings. This study employed a retrospective secondary analysis of assessment data. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with physical restraint use.
resultsIn our sample, males and younger children (4–11) experienced the most physical restraint. Results indicated that children with a diagnosis of autism (ASD), reactive attachment disorder, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and substance use disorder experienced higher rates of physical restraint than those without a diagnosis. Furthermore, externalizing symptoms, internalizing symptoms, risk of suicide and self harm, high caregiver distress, dependent cognitive skills, and living with a nonrelative were associated with physical restraint use.
conclusionsFindings provide researchers and clinicians with important insights into risk factors for physical restraint among vulnerable children and youth, which can be used to inform care planning and the development of targeted prevention and early intervention programs. This research highlights the importance of identifying trauma, providing trauma-informed care, and using a standardized assessment-to-intervention approach across service sectors to reduce the use of physical restraints in child and youth mental health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.