ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026
Mapping the landscape and future directions of stem cell therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study systematically analyzed 170 registered clinical trials to clarify the global development landscape of stem cell therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its core challenges, and put forward corresponding future research directions. The results showed that the research on this therapy has accelerated significantly in the past three decades, with research geographically clustered in the US, China and Spain, and severe underrepresentation of African countries. The therapy is mainly focused on Crohn's disease (CD), especially refractory perianal fistulas, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) account for over 70% of the applied cell types. Among 88 completed trials, 29.5% achieved primary endpoints, showing preliminary efficacy, yet the field faces prominent challenges: 20.6% of trials were prematurely terminated, early-phase studies dominate, Phase IV trials and long-term efficacy data are scarce, primary endpoints are highly heterogeneous, pediatric research is limited, and most completed trials have unknown outcomes. To address these issues, this study proposes that the future research should prioritize international cooperation to promote research equity, standardize efficacy endpoints, integrate long-term follow-up into study designs, optimize stem cell source and administration protocols, and implement precise patient selection. Overcoming these bottlenecks is essential to establish stem cell therapy as an effective complementary treatment for refractory IBD and improve the prognosis of patients unresponsive to conventional therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.