Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
Quantifying intrafractional colon tumor motion on 1.5 T MR-linac cine-MRI and applying anisotropic residual-motion margins for SBRT.
Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06244537 (Study on the Safety and Efficacy of MR-Linac Technique in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study on the Safety and Efficacy of MR-Linac Technique in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo noninvasively quantify the intrafraction motion of unresectable locally advanced colon cancer (UNLACC) via 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator (MR-linac) cine-MRI and assess the preliminary feasibility of translating motion envelopes into individualized, anisotropic residual-motion margins for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) workflow.
methodsThis prospective, single‑centre, observational cross‑sectional study serves as a preliminary test to validate the workflow of a phase I single-arm clinical study and falls under the preliminary feasibility verification phase (Clinical Trials.gov NCT06244537; Initial Release Time: 01/25/2024). We first performed internal validation of a rolling-ball-based motion extraction (RBME) algorithm using a dynamic phantom on the same 1.5 T MR linac, which demonstrated negligible systematic error with a Bland‒Altman mean bias of 0.01 mm (standard deviation 0.49 mm) and 95% limits of agreement of -0.98~0.95 mm. We then prospectively accrued 24 patients for a simulated MR-linac workflow and applied RBME to cine-MRI to generate patient- and axis-specific motion envelopes. Intrafraction motion was analysed in a repeated-measures framework to test axis-by-site effects. Finally, we conducted a planning simulation prescribing 25 Gy in 5 fractions; no patients yet treated according to the proposed strategy. The simulated planning target volume (PTV) is the gross tumor volume (GTV) plus an RBME-derived anisotropic residual-motion margin and an additional 3 mm setup margin.
resultsPhantom testing supported the accuracy of RBME ( ~ ± 1 mm agreement). In patients, the mean excursions peak in the caudal/right/anterior directions and are smallest in the cranial/left/posterior directions, with the average of means centered at approximately 4 ~ 5 mm. Across all lesions, mean root-mean-square (RMS) displacement was 2.64 ± 1.32 mm cranio-caudal, 2.91 ± 1.05 mm anterior-posterior, and 2.75 ± 1.43 mm left-right. The corresponding 95th percentile (P95) excursions were 4.49 ± 2.43 mm, 4.97 ± 1.74 mm, and 4.76 ± 2.62 mm. Axis-by-segment interactions were significant for RMS (χ² 19.93, df 8, P = 0.011) and P95 (χ² 20.44, df 8, P = 0.008), indicating location-dependent anisotropy.
conclusionA phantom-validated RBME algorithm was used to characterise irregular intrafraction motion for UNLACC on a 1.5T MR-linac. The resulting motion envelopes should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and intended to inform further method development and protocol design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.