ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
The application of large language models in orthopedic postgraduate education: potentials, challenges, and future prospects.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the widespread integration of artificial intelligence (AI), orthopedics postgraduate education is transitioning into the intelligent era. Large language models (LLMs), which leverage deep learning and natural language processing (NLP), have profoundly influenced orthopedic postgraduate education through their sophisticated capabilities in coherent comprehension, contextual response and content generation. These models encompass both general-purpose tools (e.g., ChatGPT) and specialized orthopedic applications (e.g., DocOA, BioinspiredLLM, MechGPT, DrSR, and AmbossGPT). They can offer interdisciplinary research training, targeted academic guidance, real-time resource access, interactive case exercise and immersive simulation practice in orthopedics. Most models exhibited promising performance: for instance, ChatGPT-4 achieved a 61.2% accuracy on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) comparable to orthopedic residents, while DocOA significantly outperformed ChatGPT-4 with more than 142% improvement in orthopedic benchmark evaluations. The LLMs' capabilities could promote a personalized, interactive, and adaptive transformation of orthopedic postgraduate education. However, the application of LLMs faces significant challenges such as over-reliance, delayed updates and inconsistent outputs, sparking ongoing controversy in the medical education. Moving forward, establishing a comprehensive human-AI collaborative framework is imperative to optimize the application of LLMs in orthopedic postgraduate education. This holistic framework integrates learner-centered perspectives, multidimensional governance, phased implementation strategies, and geographic diversity. Together, adopting this innovative human-AI approach will strengthen the cultivation of high-level orthopedic talents for orthopedic postgraduate education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.