ArticleBioelectronic medicine2026
Vagus nerve stimulation in Crohn's disease: long-term outcomes, mechanistic insights, and the promise of non-invasive approaches.
Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe vagus nerve (VN) has anti-inflammatory properties. We have previously reported in a 1-year pilot study that VN stimulation (VNS) improved patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD). In this paper, we present the results of the long-term follow-up of these CD patients (between four and ten years) and raise questions about the use of VNS in inflammatory bowel disease.
methodsAt the end of the pilot study, the 7 patients who ended the pilot study (corresponding to a 1-year active VNS), accepted to continue VNS as well as the 2 patients retrieved from the study, because of an early worsening (at 3 months of VNS) of their disease. Patients were then followed-up twice a year as far as possible with clinical and biological evaluation. Ileo-colonoscopy, as well as intestinal ultrasound evaluation were performed as far as possible. Vagal tone was evaluated by heart rate variability (HRV). The state perceived digestive pain score and the anxiety and depression score were also evaluated.
resultsOver a decade-long follow-up of nine CD patients implanted with VNS, sustained clinical benefits were observed despite heterogeneous disease courses and treatment histories. Three patients achieved long-term remission under VNS alone, without any additional therapy at 10 years. Several others initially controlled disease activity with VNS alone for 3–7 years before required biologics or surgery, most often during COVID-19. Clinical, biological, and endoscopic markers generally improved or stabilized, with relapse episodes responding to added standard therapies when needed. Autonomic data showed increased median parasympathetic HRV (HFnu) after implantation, persisting over six years despite interindividual variability. Median anxiety–depression scores decreased below clinical thresholds, and digestive pain shifted from moderate to low within the first year and remained low thereafter. Overall, long-term VNS was feasible, well tolerated, and associated with durable symptom control or remission in this small pilot cohort.
conclusionsThis pilot study should primarily be viewed as a proof-of-concept demonstration that long-term invasive cervical VNS is feasible, safe, and acceptable for CD patients. It also highlights a potential therapeutic signal in a subset of individuals, supporting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.