ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Strengthening community-based doula and clinician partnerships through implementation and dissemination science approaches: a mixed-methods pilot study.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Six-month mental health outcomes among participants in a postpartum care in the NICU (PeliCaN) trial: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaboration between community-based doulas and clinical care teams improves birth outcomes, yet partnerships are hindered by operational, communication, and role clarity challenges. Evidence is lacking on scalable, low-burden strategies to strengthen these relationships outside of formal intervention settings.
methodsRapid deductive content analysis of focus groups and interviews with 12 perinatal clinicians and 11 community-based doulas was conducted. Findings informed a five-minute video vignette illustrating the role of community-based doulas and their hopes for partnerships with clinical care teams. The vignette was screened in two settings: with community-based participants (n = 72), and with clinical healthcare professionals (n = 21).
resultsIn the first screening, 94% of participants indicated that the vignette honored doula voices either "completely" or "mostly" (n = 72). Participants reported that the vignette centered authentic voices and presented clear, relatable narratives. In the second screening (n = 21), the 13-item Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS) assessed perceived interprofessional collaboration across three subscales (Communication, Accommodation, and Isolation). Mean total ICS scores increased from 2.63 to 2.90 (t(20) = 3.27, p = .004, Cohen's dz = 0.71). Communication and Accommodation subscales also improved significantly (Communication: 2.70 to 3.09, p < .001, dz = 0.87; Accommodation: 2.75 to 3.08, p = .010, dz = 0.62).
conclusionsCombining rapid qualitative analysis with vignette-based dissemination is a feasible approach to improve partnerships outside of intervention settings. The vignette's strongest influence was on perceptions and willingness to collaborate. This approach represents a scalable, low-burden strategy that may be adapted across interprofessional collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.