ArticleBMC health services research2026
Antimicrobial resistance and physician prescribing of antibiotics in Alberta: a qualitative exploration.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is acknowledged by the World Health Organization as a top-ten danger to public health. In Canada, AMR accounted for over 12,900 deaths in 2019. Alarmingly, 80% of oral antibiotic prescriptions in Alberta, Canada are issued by physicians, with nearly 40% considered inappropriate. The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) aims to address this with ‘MD Snapshot-Prescribing’, an interactive tool providing information on physicians’ prescribing. This study explores Alberta physicians’ views on antibiotic prescribing, AMR, and antimicrobial stewardship; and assesses the MD Snapshot’s impact on physician prescribing practices.
methodsThis study employed focus group interviews with a purposive sample of physicians registered in Alberta. Virtual focus group sessions were conducted via ZOOM between May to June 2023. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic content analysis to extract meaningful insights.
resultsWe conducted seven focus groups involving 21 physicians, revealing three major themes: physicians’ knowledge about AMR and stewardship; antibiotic prescribing practices; and insights from MD Snapshot-Prescribing. The study unveiled significant variability in antibiotic prescribing practices among physicians, influenced by factors including patient demographics, practice settings, and encountered health issues. MD Snapshot-Prescribing emerged as a valuable educational and self-reflection tool, informed a reduction in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and promoted evidence-based practices.
conclusionsThe study found that targeted interventions by regulators can positively influence prescribing practices and produced recommendations for the CPSA to enhance future iterations of MD Snapshot-Prescribing by presenting antibiotic prescribing data by diagnosis, prescribers, practice settings, panel size, and specialty group. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.