ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026
Single-cell omics uncovers novel pathological mechanisms and therapeutic targets for congenital heart diseases: insights from integrated intercellular communication analysis.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) affects approximately 1% of live births worldwide and remains the leading cause of infant mortality from congenital anomalies. Despite advances in diagnosis and therapeutics, the molecular mechanisms underlying CHD pathogenesis remain incompletely understood, limiting the development of efficient targeted therapies. Single-cell omics approaches including single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have revolutionized our understanding of cardiac cellular heterogeneity and intercellular signalling. This review synthesizes recent single-cell omics studies in cardiogenesis and CHD, and presents novel insights from an integrated reanalysis to identify potential therapeutic targets.
methodsWe systematically reviewed single-cell omics studies in human cardiogenesis and CHD (2019-2025), then reanalysed the Hill et al. dataset comprising 157,273 nuclei from paediatric patients across five diagnostic categories, including neonatal and infant hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with healthy donor controls. We quantified cardiac-specific ligand-receptor interactions to characterize disease-specific intercellular communication networks through pathway enrichment and network topology analysis.
resultsReanalysis revealed extensive remodelling of cell-cell communication networks across CHD subtypes, each displaying distinct signalling architectures. Neonatal HLHS and TOF demonstrated hyperactivation of metabolic and growth factor pathways with highly centralized endothelial cell (EC) to cardiomyocyte (CM) and cardiac fibroblast (CF) to CM networks. DCM showed selective metabolic enhancement with preserved integration. In contrast, HCM exhibited broad pathway suppression, particularly morphogen signalling, and fragmented connectivity with weakened CF-CM and EC-CM coupling. Infant HLHS represented an intermediate phenotype with suppressed Notch and extracellular matrix signalling.
conclusionsSingle-cell omics studies have revealed cellular heterogeneity and disease-specific mechanisms across CHD subtypes. Our network-based reanalysis demonstrates that CHD involves not only transcriptional defects but also profound disruptions in multicellular communication, with each subtype exhibiting distinct signalling architectures. These findings provide a foundation for precision therapeutic strategies tailored to individual CHD subtypes, with future multimodal approaches accelerating clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.