ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026
Lessons learned: challenges in recruiting and engaging people with heavy cannabis use for online interventions in Canada.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04965012 (Testing the Efficacy of an Online Evidence-Based Treatment for Heavy Cannabis Use in Canadian Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Testing the Efficacy of an Online Evidence-Based Treatment for Heavy Cannabis Use in Canadian Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople who seek treatment often disengage between completing screening and starting treatment. Among those who begin treatment, many have low completion of program content and are lost to follow up. Currently, little is known about predictive factors of treatment initiation and engagement. The aims of this secondary analysis of the Canadian CANreduce program were to discuss the practicality of a randomized controlled trial for online heavy cannabis use treatment and to examine predictors of treatment initiation and engagement in the Canadian CANreduce program.
methodThe CANreduce intervention was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov for traceability (ID: NCT04965012). Statistical models were organized into three conceptual predictor groupings using baseline data: individual cannabis-specific factors, mental health and other substance use factors, and treatment belief factors. Binary logistic regressions examined which factors predicted treatment initiation in the CANreduce treatment program and multiple regression analyses examined which factors predicted percentage of the CANreduce program modules completed among participants who initiated treatment.
resultsDespite following the core elements of published treatment retention protocols, challenges in recruitment were evident. Of 928 people who created a profile on the website and began screeners, 86.3% (n = 801) completed screeners. Of the 801 who completed screeners, 31.3% (n = 251) were eligible for the program. Of those eligible and assigned to active treatment, 54.3% (n = 51) assigned to the therapist condition and 45.7% (n = 43) assigned to the research assistant condition initiated treatment. Treatment initiation predictors included higher cannabis use problems score, lower family history density, increased alcohol use frequency, and more positive attitudes towards treatment. Treatment engagement (percentage of program completed) predictors included increased social motives for cannabis use and more positive attitudes towards treatment. DISCUSSION: This secondary analysis shifts the focus from treatment efficacy to pre-treatment attrition and early engagement in an online cannabis intervention. Substantial recruitment and initiation challenges were observed, highlighting vulnerabilities in the treatment-seeking pathway before content is accessed. By identifying predictors of treatment initiation and module completion, this study offers practical “lessons learned” to inform recruitment and engagement strategies in future online cannabis trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.