ArticleBMC nursing2026
Comparison of immersive virtual reality and video-based home visit simulations for developing nursing students' perceived clinical reasoning, learning satisfaction, and engagement: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHome visits require students to integrate clinical reasoning with environmental assessments; however, most virtual reality (VR) studies focus on hospital settings. No randomized controlled trial has also compared immersive VR with conventional video-based training in home visit contexts. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether immersive VR-based home visit training improves students’ perceived clinical reasoning skills and learning experiences compared with video-based training.
methodsA parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted among third-year nursing students in Tokyo. Participants were allocated to an intervention (VR-based training; n = 39) or a control (video-based training; n = 40) group. Three scenarios were used, representing an older person, an older couple, and parents with a newborn. The primary outcome was self-perceptions of clinical reasoning skills, while secondary outcomes included the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale©, Educational Practices Questionnaire©, and Simulation Design Scale©.
resultsSeventy-eight female participants aged approximately 20 years were included in the analyses. Both groups showed significant within-group improvements in self-perceived clinical reasoning ability However, no significant between-group differences were observed in either domain. Similarly, no between-group differences were found in learning satisfaction, self-confidence, or overall National League for Nursing’s Scale scores. Although total Educational Practices Questionnaire© scores did not differ between the groups, the VR group rated significantly higher in active learning, collaboration, and high expectations than the control group. On the Simulation Design Scale©, the VR group rated support and problem-solving significantly higher, whereas the control group assigned higher importance ratings to support and fidelity.
conclusionsImmersive VR-based simulation did not demonstrate superiority over video-based simulation in improving self-perceived clinical reasoning or learning satisfaction. However, it was associated with enhanced learner engagement in selected domains, including active learning, collaboration, and problem-solving. Immersive VR-based simulation may enrich experiential aspects of home visit education and serve as a valuable pedagogical approach within existing community-based nursing curricula. CLINICAL
trial registrationUMIN000049037 (Date of registration: September 27, 2022).(https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055866). This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry before starting the study (ID: UMIN000049037; date of registration: September 27, 2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.