ArticleBMC health services research2026
The trade-off between coverage and benefit: spatiotemporal variation of China's health insurance and its influencing factors.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAchieving universal health coverage has become a global priority, yet internal regional inequalities remain a major challenge within health systems worldwide. China has achieved universal health insurance coverage; however, substantial inequalities persist across provinces, shaped by decentralized welfare governance and uneven socioeconomic development. Existing research has primarily examined urban–rural and population-based inequities, but comprehensive national-level evidence on regional disparities remains limited, particularly since UHC was achieved. This study investigates the spatiotemporal variation of China’s health insurance development and identifies the structural factors driving inter-regional differences.
methodsMacro-panel data were collected from official statistical yearbooks. The entropy weight method was used to construct development indices, and the Dagum-Gini coefficient decomposition method was applied to analyze sources of regional disparities. Ward hierarchical clustering was used to identify provincial distribution patterns of coverage and benefit. Fixed-effects ordinary least squares models were employed to examine influencing factors.
resultsDespite overall developmental progress, substantial and widening inter-regional disparities persist, primarily driven by divergence between eastern and central/western provinces. Most provinces achieved full or broad coverage with moderate benefit, whereas economically developed eastern provinces showed high benefit but lower coverage, indicating a coverage–benefit trade-off. Under the hukou-based eligibility system, population inflow significantly reduced local coverage rates. Benefit expenditure was positively correlated with fiscal capacity and ageing-related risk structure, while inter-provincial competition significantly shaped benefit generosity, particularly in developed regions.
conclusionsRegional disparities in China’s health insurance system remain substantial. Rather than a deliberate strategic trade-off, these disparities reflect a structural polarization driven by decentralized governance. Population mobility strongly affects coverage, while benefit levels are determined by fiscal capacity, demographic risk structure, and governance competition effects. Policy efforts should focus on eliminating hukou-based restrictions, enhancing portability for migrant populations, strengthening equalization transfers, and developing nationally standardized benefit packages to promote equitable progress toward UHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.