ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Association between refractive status and quantitative corneal subbasal nerve plexus parameters in young adults.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the association between refractive status and quantitative corneal subbasal nerve plexus (SBNP) parameters in healthy young adults, and to explore their relationships with ocular biometric measures. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 264 healthy participants (one righteye each, 18–38 years). Eyes were grouped by spherical equivalent (SE) into hyperopia, emmetropia, low, moderate, and high myopia. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy was performed, and SBNP parameters were quantified using automated analysis (ACCMetrics v3): corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal total branch density (CTBD), and corneal nerve fiber width (CNFW). Group differences were tested, and associations with SE, axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal curvature were assessed using Spearman correlation. Results: CNFD, CNFL, and CNBD differed significantly among refractive groups and showed a decreasing trend with increasing myopia, whereas CTBD did not show a clear between-group difference and CNFW did not differ significantly between groups. SE was positively associated with CNFD, CNFL, and CNBD (all P < 0.001). The association between SE and CTBD was statistically significant but weak (r ≈ 0.12), suggesting limited clinical relevance.AL was negatively correlated with CNFD, CNFL, CNBD, and CTBD (all P < 0. 05). CCT showed no significant association with SBNP parameters, and corneal curvature demonstrated limited association. Conclusions: In healthy young adults, greater myopia and longer axial length are associated with lower density-, length-, and branching-related SBNP metrics on confocal microscopy. These data provide clinically relevant baseline reference information for refractive-surgery candidates and may aid preoperative counseling and ocular surface evaluation. Longitudinal studies are warranted to clarify temporal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.