ArticleBMC medicine2026
Non-invasive diagnosis strategy integrating PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for patients with suspected prostate cancer: a multi-center study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are widely used for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis but remain limited by false positives and modest specificity, particularly in distinguishing benign prostate diseases (BPDs) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Existing studies often rely on small, single-center cohorts with limited generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a multimodal radiomics model integrating PET/CT and mpMRI for automated PCa diagnosis, and to evaluate the impact of prostate VOI delineation strategies.
methodsA total of 488 patients with suspected PCa who underwent both ^68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI (T2 and DWI) followed by biopsy were retrospectively enrolled from two centers (366 for model development and ten-fold internal validation; 41 for external validation cohort 1; 81 for external validation cohort 2). Radiomics features were extracted from both modalities, and six classical machine learning classifiers (LR, SVM, Random Forest, Extra Trees, XGBoost, LightGBM) were trained for three tasks: (1) csPCa diagnosis, (2) overall PCa detection, and (3) comparison between expert-drawn and deep learning generated prostate VOIs. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV.
resultsAmong 407 patients, 137 had BPD, 25 had clinically insignificant PCa, and 250 had csPCa. The multimodal PET/mpMRI radiomics model achieved the best performance with LightGBM (AUC = 0.91 internally; 0.825 externally). Automatically segmented VOIs achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to expert annotations, with AUC differences within 3-8%.
conclusionsThe proposed multimodal PET/CT and mpMRI ML-based model enables accurate risk stratification for prostate cancer, with strong external generalizability. Automated prostate segmentation provides comparable diagnostic performance to expert manual delineation, facilitating clinical scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.